Legal Opinion

Ace Office Cleaning Corp. v. Brodsky, Hopf & Adler, P. C.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided February 4, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur E. Blyn , J.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of $880.50 with interest thereon from December 31, 1973 together with the costs and disbursements of this action, upon the ground that this action is based upon instruments for the payment of money only and that there is no defense thereto. Defendant has not submitted any opposition to the motion.

Plaintiff alleges that accounts stated for work, labor and services furnished by plaintiff to defendant for the original total amount of $2,302.90 were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brickman v. Niagara Fruit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Interman Industrial Products, Ltd. v. R. S. M. Electron Power, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maglich v. Saxe, Bacon & Bolan, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Anthony M. Barraco, P. C. v. RosendaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Stern v. Chemical BankCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
  4. Rhee v. MeyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API