Legal Opinion
Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 23, 2009No. C 08-03251 WHAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Psystar Corporation has moved to compel Apple Inc. to provide evidence regarding the injury Apple has allegedly suffered, including profit margins. In turn, Apple has filed a cross-motion for a protective order to prevent Psystar from seeking information regarding its profit margins on the sale of its computer models. Because Apple’s profit margins are not required for either parties’ claims or defenses in this action, Psystar’s motion to compel is Denied,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lasercomb America, Inc. v. Job Reynolds Larry Holliday, and Holiday Steel Rule Die CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Aurora World, Inc. v. Ty Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Equine Legal Solutions, PC v. DigitalOcean, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.