Legal Opinion

United States v. Peter Collins, A/K/A "Gypsy Black", and Inett Branch

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1972No. 72-2063PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

On this appeal, the defendants, Peter Collins, also known as “Gypsy Black,’’ and Inett Branch, challenge their convictions for knowingly and intentionally distributing 12.58 grams of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We affirm.

The defendants contend, first, that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that the testimony of an addict-informer is inherently suspect and should be weighed with great caution. At trial, the Government called Henry Hawkins, a former heroin addict, as a witness to testify against the defendants. Hawkins was an informer…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark Edwin CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Paul F. GregorioCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Edward Williams, United States of America v. Andrew Blandin, A/K/A "Zigzag" "Jigsaw," United States of America v. Anthony Tate, A/K/A "Coco,"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  4. People v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. United States v. Joe Garcia, Guillermo Sandoval, and Mario SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API