Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Kallinen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 2017No. 01-12-00050-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

Jane Bland, Justice

In this appeal, we determine whether the City of Houston must pay attorney’s fees to compensate a citizen who pursued and won access to information under the Texas Public Information Act. Invoking the PIA, Randall Kallinen asked the City of Houston to disclose information regarding a traffic-light camera study that the City had commissioned. The City granted part of the request, but it withheld some documents while it sought an opinion from the Attorney General about whether the withheld documents were subject to disclosure. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kubbernus v. ECAL Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  2. Troy E. Nehls, Sheriff, and Fort Bend County, Texas v. Hartman Newspapers, LP D/B/A Fort Bend Herald and Texas CoasterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. AIM Media Texas, LLC D/B/A the Odessa American v. City of Odessa, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2023
  4. AIM Media Texas, LLC D/B/A the Odessa American v. City of Odessa, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2023
  5. Austex Tree Service, Inc. v. Unifirst Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API