Legal Opinion

Afram Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 25, 1962No. C.D. 2360PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LawreNce, Judge:

Plaintiff has invoked the jurisdiction of this court, pursuant to the terms of section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1514), and claims that an importation invoiced as “scrap secondary aluminum ingots for remelting only” is entitled to entry free of duty, pursuant to the provisions of Public Law 869.

*54The report of the collector of customs transmitting the protest to the court states that the merchandise was classified in liquidation as “Aluminum Ingots scrap” in paragraph 374 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 374), and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of iy2…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MacNichol Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alloys & Chemicals Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Allots & Chemicals Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API