MacNichol Packing Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGkaham, Presiding Judge
The appellants, MacNichol Packing Co., L. D. Clark & Son, R. J. Peacock Canning Co., Columbian Canning Co., Globe Canning Co., J. W. Beardsleys Sons, and Seacoast Canning Co., made 15 importations of salt, which were severally entered for warehousing, under the Tariff Act of 1922.
It has been stipulated here that protest 76407-G/512 of MacNichol Packing Co. and the reports and other papers returned therewith are typical of all the other protests. Whatever references to the facts are made herein, therefore, will be with reference to the above-mentioned protest.
The record discloses that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Morris European & American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Gump Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Spencer, Kellogg & Sons (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Kronfeld v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. RettigCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Armour v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Afram Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
- Guy B. Barham Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- Hoyt v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.