Legal Opinion

Tower v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 18, 1954No. C. D. 1657PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

By its protest, plaintiff seeks to recover duties alleged to have been incorrectly imposed on certain importations of aluminum ingots from Canada.

The collector of customs assessed duty at the rate of l}& cents per pound on the merchandise as aluminum in crude form, provided for in paragraph 374 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 374), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (86 Treas. Dec. 121, T. D. 62739), reading as follows:

Aluminum, and alloys (except those provided for in paragraph 302, Tariff Act of 1930) in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walco Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Schlesinger v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Tower & Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Afram Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Burstrom v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Frema, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API