Legal Opinion

In re Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(h)

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 21, 1995No. Nos. 85585, 85801PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We are asked in two separate petitions to amend the procedural rules providing for discovery depositions in criminal and juvenile delinquency proceedings. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. In the first petition, Florida’s Attorney General, the State Attorneys of Florida, the Statewide Prosecutor, and various other attorneys ask this Court to substantially limit the availability of discovery depositions under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(h) and to totally abolish the availability of discovery depositions under Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.060(d). In the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. In Re Amendment to Florida Rule Crim. Proc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(h)Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. M.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(h)Supreme Court of Florida · 1997
  4. M.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API