In Re Amendment to Florida Rule Crim. Proc.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
550 So.2d 1097 (1989)
In re AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.220 (DISCOVERY).
No. 73734.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 3, 1989.
As Amended on Denial of Rehearing November 2, 1989.
Rutledge R. Liles, President, The Florida Bar, Jacksonville, Stephen N. Zack, President-elect, The Florida Bar, Miami, Honorable Stan R. Morris, Chairman, Supreme Court Criminal Discovery Com'n, Gainesville, Anthony C. Musto, Acting Chairman, Florida Criminal Procedure Rules Committee, Miami, John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Barry A. Cohen, President, Florida Ass'n…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence · Grimes; Concurrence · Overton; Concurrence · Grimes; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. WatersSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Sparks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MartinezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- In re Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(h)Supreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Boughey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991