Legal Opinion

Berto v. Wilson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1958No. 4013PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Merrill, J.:

This is an action to quiet title to mining property. Mining claims located by the respective parties overlap and to that extent are in dispute. Judgment was entered by the trial court, sitting without jury, quieting title in the respondents to the property claimed by them. From that judgment this appeal is taken. The sole question involved is whether the record supports the determination of the trial court that respondents were senior in the posting of their claims and in the discovery of mineral in place and thus were senior in location of the disputed area.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. King v. Amy & Silversmith Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Shoshone Min. Co. v. RutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  4. Globe Mining Co. v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Rummell v. BaileyUtah Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brandon v. TravitskyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Western Standard Uranium Company v. ThurstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ewing v. SargentNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Douglas Spencer and Associates v. Las Vegas Sun, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Crofoot v. HillNevada Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API