Legal Opinion
Fairchild, Arabatzis & Smith, Inc. v. Sackheim
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 28, 1978No. 78 Civ. 435PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs sue the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) and two of its agents for allegedly wrongful conduct in connection with the commencement and conduct of a Commission investigation. Fairchild, Arabatzis & Smith, Inc. (“FAS”), a registered futures commission merchant, and Steven A. Arabatzis (“Arabatzis”), FAS’ president, claim that the Commission’s current investigation of FAS was instituted to harass the plaintiffs, was motivated by a criminal design, and has been carried out in a manner that has abused and intimidated FAS’ employees. It is claimed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Doe v. United States Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Jones v. B. C. Christopher & Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1979
- Skoller v. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Greater New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. FoxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Group Health Inc. v. Blue Cross Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.