Legal Opinion

United States v. Bush & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 5, 1914No. 1164PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeai, from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 31640 (T. D. 33263.)

1Per curiam

This was an importation of wire. The court held that inasmuch as the weigher’s return was a necessary and statutory part of the record before the collector in the official ascertainment of the appropriate rate of duty under the provisions of paragraph 135, it was entitled to and should for that reason receive consideration in the ascertainment of the question whether or not a case of manifest clerical error was presented. United States v. Swedish Produce Co, (4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 223; T. D. 33437); United States v. Wyman & Co. (4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 264; T. D. 33485); United States v. National…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marriott v. BruneSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Browne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  3. United States v. WymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. United States v. Swedish Produce Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. United States v. Proctor CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Tampa Box Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Bel Paese Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  3. Igstaedter & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. United States v. Woodward-Newhouse Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  5. United States v. Kuttroff, Pickhardt & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API