Legal Opinion

Beck v. Johnson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky

Decided April 13, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, District Judge.

This civil action at law for the recovery of $20,000 damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate was brought in the state court, and, having been removed by the defendants to this court, a motion to remand it has been made by the plaintiff. The petition for removal, after showing (as, indeed, the plaintiff’s petition on its face had done) that the matter in dispute exceeds in value the sum of $2,000 exclusive of interest' and costs, asserts that “the action is one arising under the laws of the United States,” and is therefore within Removal Act March 3, 1875, c. 137,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Newburyport Water Co. v. NewburyportSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Westerfield's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Hiatt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
  3. Hill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
  4. R. W. Hart & Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. United States v. Cooper Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API