Legal Opinion

R. W. Hart & Co. v. Harris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 27, 1938No. 25139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

This is an appeal by R. W. Hart & Company, a corporation, plaintiff in error, defendant below, from an order of the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., granting to James A. Harris, defendant in error, plaintiff below, a temporary injunction restraining the Continental Petroleum Company from paying certain suma of money to R. W. Hart & Company, which the said James A. Harris claims as his portion of certain fees paid, or to be paid, by the Continental Petroleum Company to Hart & Company. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

A review of the record shows…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Steele v. DrummondSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Huber v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Beck v. JohnsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sabine Corp. v. ONG Western, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Camp v. Black Gold Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Rogers v. Lassiter, Adm'r.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Araiza v. ChapaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. MIF Realty L.P. v. Duncan Development Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API