Legal Opinion
United States v. Cooper Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 16, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendants to dismiss the complaint because it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
The complaint sets forth an alleged claim under Section 7 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 210, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15 note, asking for treble damages allegedly suffered by the United States in purchasing tires from the defendants at uniform prices.
Section 7 of the Sherman Act reads as follows: “Any person who shall be injured in his business or property by any other person or corporation by reason of anything forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Railroad Co. v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Fleitmann Ex Rel. Stockholders of the Consolidated Street Lighting Co. v. Welsbach Street Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Davis v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Winkler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Cooper Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Winkler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971