Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Clarkson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Lake County: Lionel R. Webster, Judge. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, C. J.

This is a suit in equity, brought by the plaintiff against the defendant as his agent, for an accounting of alleged business transactions covering a period of about eight years. The facts show that in October, 1880, the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement whereby the defendant was to take full charge and control of plaintiff’s stock, consisting of horses, mules, and cattle, and of. certain ranches then in *52possession of the plaintiff, it being understood that the defendant as such agent was to sell the increase of said stock and pay the expenses of carrying on the business out of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fleischner, Mayer & Co. v. KubliOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Matasce v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Gleason v. DensonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Beach v. Guaranty Sav. Assoc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Williams v. CulverOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Fisk v. BascheOregon Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API