City of Oakland v. Hogan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
An appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants following an order sustaining their demurrers to an amended complaint which plaintiff, although granted leave to do so, did not elect to further amend.
The proceeding was instituted by the City of Oakland, a municipal corporation, by and through its Board of Port Commissioners; it is in the nature of quo warranto and was brought under the provisions of section 811 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Stats. 1937, chap. 575, p. 1616) to determine the authority of respondents to operate and maintain a wharf within the territorial limits of the City of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Boone v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Haggerty v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- City of Santa Cruz v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.