Legal Opinion
Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 1987No. 19692PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
The family of Earl Clark appeals a summary judgment in favor of State Farm (insurer). Clark was killed by an uninsured motorist who negligently hit the motorcycle Clark was driving. Clark had not insured his motorcycle, but had purchased insurance for his car from insurer. Clark’s family sued insurer, attempting to collect under an uninsured motorist clause in the insurance policy issued for the car. We affirm the summary judgment in favor of insurer.
The policy issued by insurer for the car contains an uninsured motorist clause, which is limited by another clause stating that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Lyon v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- Shipley v. American Standard Insurance Co. of Wis.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Otto v. Farmers Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Howell v. Balboa Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, in 90-1534 v. Earl D. Hampton, Jr., Earl D. Hampton, Sr. And Barbara Hampton, in 90-1523Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Clampit v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Wagner v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.