People v. Ish

Defendant appeals as of right his bench

trial conviction of first-degree home invasion, MCL 750.110a(2)(b). We affirm.

Defendant argues that the statement he made to the police that he was “looking for food” was inadmissible under both the corpus delicti rule and Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436; 86 S Ct 1602; 16 L Ed 2d 694 (1966). Because defendant failed to preserve these issues for appeal, both issues are reviewed for plain error affecting defendant’s substantial rights. People v Carines, 460 Mich 750, 763; 597 NW2d 130 (1999).

Defendant argues that the prosecution failed to establish the…