People v. King
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Sawyer, EJ.
We are asked in this case to determine what constitutes the corpus delicti for a charge of accessory after the fact. In light of the purpose of the rule, we determine that the corpus delicti of accessory after the fact is the same as the corpus delicti of the underlying crime itself. In this case, because the prosecutor had established the corpus delicti for both murder and unlawfully driving away an automobile, the trial court properly admitted defendant’s confession to being an accessory after the fact to murder and an accessory after the fact to unlawfully driving away an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. KonradMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HernandezArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- PEOPLE v McMAHANMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. HugheyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. GayheartMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. CollinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- People of Michigan v. Kevin-Jamel Rashard MyersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- People of Michigan v. Lantz Howard WashingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2024
- People of Michigan v. Ronald Matthew Hartman JrMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015