Legal Opinion

People v. King

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 2006No. Docket 259295PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sawyer, EJ.

We are asked in this case to determine what constitutes the corpus delicti for a charge of accessory after the fact. In light of the purpose of the rule, we determine that the corpus delicti of accessory after the fact is the same as the corpus delicti of the underlying crime itself. In this case, because the prosecutor had established the corpus delicti for both murder and unlawfully driving away an automobile, the trial court properly admitted defendant’s confession to being an accessory after the fact to murder and an accessory after the fact to unlawfully driving away an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. KonradMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. HernandezArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. PEOPLE v McMAHANMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. HugheyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. GayheartMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. CollinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. People of Michigan v. Kevin-Jamel Rashard MyersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. People of Michigan v. Lantz Howard WashingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2024
  5. People of Michigan v. Ronald Matthew Hartman JrMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API