Application of Carl K. Stewart, Deceased, by Mabel R. Stewart, Administratrix, De Bonis Non
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Judge.
The decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the Primary Examiner’s rejection for lack of invention of claims 3, 4, 7, 8, 13 and 14 of appellant’s application for a patent on a process for photomechanically reproducing engineering drawings is reviewed herein. Eight claims of the application were allowed.
Illustrative of the type of engineering drawing to be reproduced by the process defined in the appealed claims is the loft layout or master drawing which is prepared as a preliminary step in connection with the production of a particular new…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Application of BorcherdtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Application of PorterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. Kollsman Instrument CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Westwood Chemical, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Application of Bernard L. ZenitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- In re RuffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Tinnerman Products, Inc. v. George K. Garrett Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.