Anderson v. Whitehead, Eggleston & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Debtor and creditor. Statute of frauds. Before Judge Knight. Cobb Superior Court. March Term, 1875. Reported in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Judge.
This suit is brought by Whitehead, Egglestou & Company, to recover a balance on an account from Anderson & Tucker. The defendants defend by setting up an agreement between plaintiffs and themselves, and Reede & Herndon, whereby it is agreed by the three firms that Reede & Herndon shall pay the debt of defendants to plaintiffs, and plaintiffs shall look to them for payment and release defendants, Reede & Herndou being indebted to defendants as much as the account of plaintiffs against defendants. All parties assent to this arrangement, and ‘a payment is made by Reede & Herndon…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Coldwell Co. v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Palmetto Mfg. Co. v. Parker & AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Ferst's Sons & Co. v. Bank of WaycrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Cowart v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Didschuneit v. Enochs Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.