Legal Opinion
Klag v. Home Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 19, 1967No. 42780PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
Only Headnote 3 requires elaboration. Pretermitting the question of whether grounds 6, 7, and 9 of the demurrers sustained were insufficient to present any question for decision (a) because the demurrers do not point out wherein the “petition” shows it “has not satisfied the provisions of the Statute of Frauds” or (b) because the Statute of Frauds referred to in the demurrers is described only as to title, section and paragraph of “Ga. Code Anno.,” etc., and is therefore defective because no law of the State of Georgia or the statute of frauds of the State of Georgia is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Regus v. SchartkoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. DickinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Burney v. BallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
- Palmetto Mfg. Co. v. Parker & AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Ferst's Sons & Co. v. Bank of WaycrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- National Independent Theatre Exhibitors, Inc. v. Charter Financial Group, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- European Bakers, Ltd. v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Vitner v. FunkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Goolsby v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Hazen v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.