Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Buckson v. Amato
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided August 10, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Chancellor:
In these four actions the State, on the relation of the Attorney General (“plaintiff”), charges that the defendants were using various premises for illegal gambling as defined in 11 Del.C. § 669 (receiving and recording horse bets), and were thereby guilty of maintaining a nuisance under 10 Del.C. § 7102. Plaintiff sought, inter alia, a permanent injunction under 10 Del.C. § 7106.
*390In the first three actions filed (C.A. 1707, 1708, and 1709) plaintiff sought and obtained a preliminary injunction. State of Delaware ex rel. Bove v. Amato, State of Delaware ex rel. Bove v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ridge v. State Ex Rel. TateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- State v. AmatoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
- State v. AmatoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
- State v. RossittoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marsland v. PangHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
- Shaw v. Riverdell HospitalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- State v. SposatoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1967
- State v. AmatoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
- State ex rel. Buckson v. SposatoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1967