Legal Opinion
State v. Sposato
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided November 17, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Chancellor.
The question for decision is whether an order should issue under 10 Del.C. § 7106 (e) perpetually enjoining defendant Samuel Sposato from maintaining illegal gambling, contrary to 11 Del.C. § 669, anywhere within the State of Delaware. 1
A
On October 16, 1963 the State of Delaware filed a complaint under 10 Del.C. § 7103 for an order enjoining Sposato from maintaining any gambling contrary to 11 Del.C. § 669 at 619 North Madison Street, Wilmington, and elsewhere in the State. Sposato leased part of the Madison Street premises from Antoinetta DiMaio Rodolico, who was also named…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hughes v. HannahSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
- State Ex Rel. Buckson v. MancariSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
- Hedden v. HandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- Schaffer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- State ex rel. Buckson v. AmatoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marsland v. PangHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
- Torbert v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Cox v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1970