Legal Opinion

State v. Rossitto

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 8, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

The State brought this action under 10 Del.C. §§ 7101-7109 to abate a nuisance alleged to exist at 703 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware. The conduct complained of is illegal gambling, and the named defendants are charged with “maintaining a nuisance” within the meaning of the statute. A restraining order was issued pursuant to the prayers of the complaint. Subsequently, after service of process upon each of the named defendants, a hearing was held on the State’s application for a temporary injunction and the court orally indicated that a preliminary injunction would…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wilcox v. RyderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. United States v. BoyntonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Buckson v. AmatoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
  2. State v. RossittoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API