Legal Opinion
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,797 Norman E. Peterson v. Shearson/american Express, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 9, 1988No. 85-2158PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellee Norman C. Peterson (Peterson) commenced this action in April 1983. His complaint alleged that a broker employed by defendant-appellant Shear-son/American Express, Inc. (Shearson) was responsible for losses incurred by Peterson arising from trading in stock options. The complaint stated six claims for relief: one federal claim based on § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1934 Exchange Act), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, and five pendent state law claims. Shearson successfully moved for a more definite statement,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Kelli Lyn Metz, and v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Hill v. Ricoh Americas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Coors Brewing Co. v. Molson BreweriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.