Legal Opinion
Kelli Lyn Metz, and v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 8, 1994No. 91-6285, 91-6292, 91-6315, 92-6048 and 92-6064PublishedCited by 191 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch) appeals from a judgment for $53,746.67 plus attorney’s fees. The judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff Kelli Lyn Metz (Metz) on her Title VII claim of unlawful discrimination and discharge due to her pregnancy. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. 1 After a bench trial on the Title VII claim, the district court entered findings and conclusions upholding Metz’ claim and awarded recovery for her on her claim and attorney’s fees. Our jurisdiction rests on 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
On appeal, Merrill Lynch asserts that a…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Case v. Unified School District No. 233Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- O'Neal v. Ferguson Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Susan A. Desiderio v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Susan M. ROSENBERG, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and John Wyllys, Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.