Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Villasenor
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 8, 1974No. 2 CA-CIV 1463PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the appellees requiring appellant to pay the amount of a judgment obtained by appellees in a personal injury action.
Mr. Villasenor, while employed at a Meat King Market, a retailer of meat and meat products in Tucson, Arizona, was injured on July 24, 1964, when he was directed to replace the letters on a sign in front of the market. Several months later he filed suit against Edward Robles and Ernesto Elias, dba Meat King Markets, alleging that he was in the employment of the defendants and, while in the course…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Pacific Indemnity Company v. KohlhaseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Clinchfield Railroad Company v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Herendeen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore v. SturgisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Michael Franco v. Selective Insurance Company, New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. VagnozziArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. BlomfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. PasiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.