Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Engelmann

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2002No. 21357PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKonenkamp, Justice

(on reassignment).

[¶ 1.] In this declaratory judgment action brought to contest medical malpractice insurance coverage, the circuit court granted summary judgment against the insurer, reasoning that the general verdict in the doctor’s malpractice trial was conclusive on the coverage question. The jury in that trial heard two tort theories, one that would permit coverage and another that would not. Because the insurer reserved its right to contest coverage and a question of fact remains on what, if any, part of the damages are allocable to the covered acts of the doctor, coverage must be…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. RobnikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. A-G-E Corp. v. State Ex Rel. State Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hot Stuff Foods, LLC v. Houston Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. Ehresmann v. MuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Schliem v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API