Legal Opinion

Aumada v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided February 1, 1984No. 13-82-288-crPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

Appellants were tried jointly for the offense of aggravated sexual abuse and were found guilty. Punishment was assessed by the jury at confinement for 20 years for each appellant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The State’s evidence was to the effect that the prosecutrix and a male friend were attacked in a park in Corpus Christi by three men. The male friend was severely beaten and the prosecutrix was dragged into a car in which she and the three men departed. For some period of time thereafter the prosecutrix was forced to perform oral sex with each of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Pitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. English v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. VidalUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. Baldwin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  3. Alvarez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  4. Autry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Salazar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API