Legal Opinion

Autry v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 16, 1986No. 13-86-046-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the aggravated sexual assault in which C_A_was the victim. The jury assessed punishment at 22 years in the Texas Department of Corrections and a $5,000.00 fine. Two grounds of error are raised: (1) that the pre-trial photographic identification procedure was impermissibly suggestive, and (2) that the trial judge abused his discretion in failing to grant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The identification of the appellant as the assailant is the thrust of both grounds of error. A detailed recitation of the evidence…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Dillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oestrick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  2. Villarreal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  3. David Brian Oestrick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  4. Paul Eugene Thedford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API