Legal Opinion

Claim of Griffin v. Cruikshank Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Award modified *832to cover period from September 22, 1923, to March 29, 1926, so as to exclude the period during which full wages were paid by the employer, on the authority of Matter of Sullivan v. Seely Son, Inc. (226 App. Div. 629); Bell v. Fraser (210 id. 560, 563); Matter of Rasmussen v. Park G. & M. Shop, Inc. (223 id. 591), and as so modified affirmed. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur; Davis, J., dissents in part, and votes to credit the whole sum paid as wages on the amount of compensation awarded, on the ground that the claimant would be reaping an inequitable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Fredenburg v. Empire United Railways, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. Claim of Sullivan v. G. B. Seely Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Twin Harbor Stevedoring & Tug Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Twin Harbor Stevedoring & Tug Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API