Legal Opinion
Claim of Sullivan v. G. B. Seely Son, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 19, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
The claimant was injured in the course of his employment on September 20, 1928. An award has been made to him for compensation for disability for seven and one-third weeks, and the case as to disability has been closed.
During the entire time that the claimant was disabled the employer continued to pay him his full salary of sixty dollars per week. He, therefore, met with no economic loss during the period he was unable to work. If he had been compelled to rely upon an award for compensation, the limit of his weekly allowance would have been twenty-five dollars. He has, therefore, gained…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Marhoffer v. . MarhofferNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Brassel v. Electric Welding Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Claim of Fredenburg v. Empire United Railways, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Claim of Rasmussen v. Park Garage & Machine Shop, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3Cited by10 opinions
- Twin Harbor Stevedoring & Tug Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Claim of Birmingham v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Geremski v. Department of FireNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- McCabe Inspection Service, Inc. v. WillardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Claim of Griffin v. Cruikshank Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.