Legal Opinion

Woody v. Tucker, Willingham & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 18, 1926No. 5 Div. 926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

On and before April 1, 1921, defendant J. R. Woody was indebted to complainants Tucker, Willingham & Co. in sums aggregating several thousand dollars. The larger part of these debts had come over from years antedating 1922. In January, 1922, complainants commenced an action in the circuit court of Chambers county to recover the amount of J. R. Woody’s indebtedness, and on March 7, 1922, judgment was rendered for complainants in the sum of $4,033.16 and costs. On the 23d day of the same month a certificate of judgment was filed for record in the office of the probate judge of the county.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harrell v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  2. Montgomery v. McNuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Zelnicker v. Brigham & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Moog v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Merchants' Bank v. ParrishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Williams v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Umphrey v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. RoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API