Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. Rowe

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 5, 1931No. 4 Div. 496PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Appellant filed a bill in equity to set aside a conveyance executed by its judgment debtor to his wife conveying to her their homestead consisting of a house and lot in Elba of less value than $2,000, but not exempt from the payment of appellant’s judgment, because that was founded on a claim in tort. For the purpose of treating the law of this case, therefore, it is as though it were not the homestead.

The law of fraudulent conveyances has had much treatment by this court, and we think that it is well settled by our numerous cases in all of its aspects. We will refer to some of its features…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Veitch v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. London v. G. L. Anderson Brass WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Goodlett v. HansellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Montgomery v. McNuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Levy & Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Van Antwerp v. Van AntwerpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Smith v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Williams v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Umphrey v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API