Legal Opinion

Merchants' Bank v. Parrish

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1925No. 1 Div. 380PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Appellees are man and wife. Appellant is a creditor of the husband. Appellant, complainant in the trial court, filed its bill to annul a conveyance made by defendant husband to his wife as having been made in fraud of its rights. The conveyance of dairy cattle, dairy equipment, farming implements, and a secondhand automobile, all worth about $3,500, was made in part payment of an indebtedness of the defendant B. It. Parrish to his wife in the sum of $6,500. Complainant denies that there was a bona fide indebtedness, but we think defendants’ version of the facts as to that must be accepted.'…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zelnicker v. Brigham & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Moog v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. Fidelity Mortgage Bond Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. LoveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Williams v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Cortner v. GalyonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. McCollum v. BurtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Umphrey v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API