Merchants' Bank v. Parrish
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
Appellees are man and wife. Appellant is a creditor of the husband. Appellant, complainant in the trial court, filed its bill to annul a conveyance made by defendant husband to his wife as having been made in fraud of its rights. The conveyance of dairy cattle, dairy equipment, farming implements, and a secondhand automobile, all worth about $3,500, was made in part payment of an indebtedness of the defendant B. It. Parrish to his wife in the sum of $6,500. Complainant denies that there was a bona fide indebtedness, but we think defendants’ version of the facts as to that must be accepted.'…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zelnicker v. Brigham & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Moog v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Fidelity Mortgage Bond Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
3Cited by14 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. LoveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Williams v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Cortner v. GalyonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- McCollum v. BurtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Umphrey v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.