Legal Opinion

In Re Klein

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 3, 1924No. 18PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

3 F.2d 375 (1924)

In re KLEIN.

KAPLAN et al.

v.

CLARK.

No. 18.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 3, 1924.

I. Gainsburg, of New York City (Harold R. Medina, Joseph Segal, and Leander I. Shelley, all of New York City, of counsel), for petitioners.

Isaac Steinhaus, of New York City, for respondent.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

Walter Klein, a dealer in suits and cloaks, was adjudged a bankrupt on an involuntary petition filed November 12, 1921. The petitioners were wholesale dealers of cloaks and suits, and delivered certain garments to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Zartman v. First Nat. Bank of WaterlooSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Greey v. DockendorffSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Pennsylvania Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Wynne v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  3. In Re TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1931
  4. Liebowitz v. VoielloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. Dryden v. Michigan State IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API