Legal Opinion

Dryden v. Michigan State Industries

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 20, 1933No. 9644PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

Nichols Wire, Sheet & Hardware Company, being in receivership, the state of Michigan, operating under the name of Michigan State Industries, filed a claim based upon money due on a consignment of binding twine sent to> the above company. There is no contest over the amount due. The entire controversy is over giving the claim priority of payment. Priority was urged upon the basis of an equitable lien upon the proceeds coming into the hands of the receiver because the claim arose from sale of consigned merchandise, and also because the state of Michigan had a statute…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Taxes, Aiea Dairy, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Students Book Company v. Washington Law Book CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. In re Warner-Quinlan Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. Brown v. Heister (Heister)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
  5. United States v. Menier Hardware No. 1, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API