Legal Opinion · Dissent

Russ' Kwik Car Wash, Inc. Clean Cars, Inc. v. Marathon Petroleum Company Gastown, Inc. Emro Marketing Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1985No. 84-3097Published

1DissentCornelia G. Kennedy, Circuit Judge

The earlier decisions of our Court require that we follow the control test. The existence of possible alternative rationales does not change the fact that the control standard was a vital link in the logical scheme actually used by this Court to decide both Parrish and Shavrnoch. Where the legal principles applied by this Court in a prior case differ from those applied by another Circuit, the rule of stare decisis requires that we follow the principles previously applied by this Court. Ashe v. Commissioner, 288 F.2d 345, 347 (6th Cir. 1961). “[I]t is the principle which controls and not the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API