Legal Opinion

Brittain v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1970No. 8967PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Presiding Judge.

In sustaining defendants’ motions for a new trial “on all issues,” the Circuit Court of Butler County specified “of record” (Rule 78.01) that it was doing so because plaintiff’s verdict directing instructions numbered 2 and 3 “are erroneous in that they both deviate substantially, and to prejudice of both the defendants from the forms provided in M.A.I.” Being aggrieved by this deprivation of the $15,000 verdict-judgment that had been returned and entered in her favor, plaintiff appealed and we affirm. 1

The October 1968 casualty in question occurred at nighttime where…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Brown v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. LandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Chappell v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. Zalle v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Fortner v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Barber v. M. F. A. Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Wills Ex Rel. Wills v. Townes Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. Affiliated Foods, Inc. v. StrautmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Morgan v. ToomeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Myers v. Bi-State Development AgencySupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API