Brittain v. Clark
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TITUS, Presiding Judge.
In sustaining defendants’ motions for a new trial “on all issues,” the Circuit Court of Butler County specified “of record” (Rule 78.01) that it was doing so because plaintiff’s verdict directing instructions numbered 2 and 3 “are erroneous in that they both deviate substantially, and to prejudice of both the defendants from the forms provided in M.A.I.” Being aggrieved by this deprivation of the $15,000 verdict-judgment that had been returned and entered in her favor, plaintiff appealed and we affirm. 1
The October 1968 casualty in question occurred at nighttime where…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Brown v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. LandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Chappell v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Zalle v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Fortner v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Barber v. M. F. A. Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Wills Ex Rel. Wills v. Townes Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Affiliated Foods, Inc. v. StrautmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Morgan v. ToomeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Myers v. Bi-State Development AgencySupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.