Legal Opinion

Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. Wilson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 20, 2005No. 04-169PublishedCited by 268 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the Court. †

This case presents the question whether the 6-year statute of limitations in the False Claims Act (FCA or Act), see 31 U. S. C. § 3731(b)(1), governs FCA civil actions for retaliation, see § 3730(h). We hold that it does not and therefore conclude that the most closely analogous state limitations period applies.

I

The FCA prohibits any person from making false or fraudulent claims for payment to the United States. § 3729(a). Persons who do so are liable for civil penalties of up to $10,000 per claim and treble damages. Ibid. The Act sets forth two principal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by268 opinions

  1. Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Keitt v. New York CityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. Green v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Navy Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005

263 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API