In re the Claim of Zimmermann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, P. J.
Appeal is taken by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which (1) disqualified claimant from benefits on the ground that he refused employment without good cause (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 2) and (2) imposed a forfeiture of 20 effective days in reduction of claimant’s future benefit rights, upon finding that claimant willfully made a false statement to obtain benefits (Labor Law, § 594).
The evidence was in sharp conflict and the board chose to accept that adduced from the employment interviewer Hill and from the prospective employer to whom claimant was referred,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weiland Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Corrado v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Czarlinsky v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Lowell v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
- In re the Claim of SpackNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Claim of BatihAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976