Legal Opinion
United States v. Corey
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 7, 2003No. 02-1062PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Circuit Judge.
This appeal concerns the scope of restitution that may be awarded under the Mandatory Victim Witness Restitution Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (“MVRA”). Defendant William E. Corey (“Corey”) appeals the district court’s order directing him to pay more than $42,000 in restitution to Farm Credit of Maine (“Farm Credit”), a lending institution he stands guilty of defrauding. We affirm.
I
The case arises from a fraudulent loan application. On July 26, 1997, Corey submitted an application to Farm Credit for a credit line loan supported by documents containing material…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Louis RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jerry D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. VakninCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Lee Roy Mullins, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. InnarelliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- United States v. WoodsDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2010
- United States v. BogartDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- United States v. DoddDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.