Legal Opinion
United States v. Smith
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 28, 2003No. CRIM.A.01-0263-01RMU, CRIM.A.01-0263-02RMUPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Granting the Defendants’ Motion to Apply Forfeiture to Restitution
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
This criminal action comes before the court on the defendants’ motion requesting that the court offset the victim’s restitution award against the total amount that the government remitted to the victim. Defs.’ Mot. at 1. The court exercises its discretion to grant the defendants’ motion.
Between October 1, 1999 and August 31, 2000, the defendants conspired to submit fraudulent invoices to the victim, Care-First BlueCross BlueShield (“CareFirst”), 1 during…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WEST INDIES TRANSPORT, INC.; WIT EQUIPMENT CO., INC.; And W. JAMES OELSNER, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Laurence SewardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Ehab CoriatyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Philip J. MenzaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. SimmondsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Shaun Joseph RuffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Kakeh v. United Planning Organization, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- United States v. FabianDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.