Legal Opinion

United States v. Bogart

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 1, 2007No. 1:01-cv-00164PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RESTITUTION OPINION AND ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. Introduction. -This matter comes before the Court by way of a restitution hearing held on April 21, 2006. As detailed herein, this Court finds Defendants jointly and severally liable for restitution in the amount $2,492,424.66.

II. Background 1

This case involves a complex conspiracy orchestrated by Defendants over a seven year period. In short, Defendants conspired to aid Richard Schultz (“Schultz”) in hiding his assets from his creditors, his ex-wife, and the United States Government (“the Schultz conspiracy”).

Beginning in 1994,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. Ira Silverman (90-3205) Morris G. Woodard (90-5816) and Gary Caton (90-5733/91-6506)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Paul J. SavoieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Scott Allen McDaniel (03-1940) and Gregory Warren Wade (03-2073)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Atlantic States Cast Iron Pipe Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
  2. United States v. FiorentinoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
  3. United States v. McCormickDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API