Legal Opinion

State v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 24, 1993No. 1 CA-CR 90-1377, 1 CA-CR 92-0097-PRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

Edward A. Russell (“defendant”) appeals from his jury conviction of burglary in the second degree, a class 3 felony, and from the sentence imposed. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in allowing him to waive his right to counsel, in instructing the'jury on burglary, and in sentencing him to an aggravated prison term. We conclude that the trial court did not err in allowing defendant to represent himself because the record adequately shows that defendant’s waiver was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. In addition, the trial court’s instruction to the jury on…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. State v. JoynerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. State v. McLemoreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API