State v. Rodriguez
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, J.
¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant was found guilty of possessing a narcotic drug and possessing narcotics paraphernalia. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent, presumptive prison terms, the longest of which was 2.5 years. The state concedes error in one of the three issues appellant raises on appeal, all of which pertain to his sentences. Because we agree with the state that the record does not support the trial court’s imposition of a prison sentence on the drug charge instead of a suspended sentence and probation as provided in A.R.S. § 13-901.01, we remand the case…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Fabian Aguayo-DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. FeblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. JoynerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.