Legal Opinion
Circle Floor Co. v. Siltan Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 13, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold J. Crawford, J.
This is an application to vacate a subpoena to examine the attorney for the judgment debtors as a witness and to vacate a subpoena to examine the same person as a third party.
*635The movant, the attorney for the judgment debtors, in support of the motion argues that the subpoenas should be vacated since examinations are sought relating to matters as to which the movant represented the judgment debtors as an attorney inasmuch as section 353 of the Civil Practice Act bars disclosure of such matters as privileged. Furthermore, the movant contends no witness fees were tendered or paid to him when the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Estate of FeinbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
- Howe v. StuartNew York Supreme Court · 1910
- L. Michel Plumbing & Heating Corp. v. Randall Avenue Theatre Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1943
- Castiglione v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956
- Davis v. TurnerNew York Supreme Court · 1849
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Randy International, Ltd. v. Automatic Compactor Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1979
- Ex Parte ClarkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- People v. Modern Amusement Co.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Art Board, Inc. v. Worldwide Business Exchange Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1986