Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Feinberg
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided September 28, 1945PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGarey, S.
The motions to dismiss the proceeding for discovery instituted pursuant to the provisions of section 205 of the Surrogate’s Court Act are disposed of as follows:
The motion to dismiss upon the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction of the respondents is denied. - The stipulation entered into between the attorneys for petitioner and respondents adjourning the examination was not incidental to or part of any special appearance or motion attacking the petition and service thereof on jurisdictional grounds. Furthermore, the respondents not only contested the discovery proceeding on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chellis v. . ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Braman v. BramanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Montgomery v. East Ridgelawn CemeteryNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Montgomery v. East Ridgelawn CemeteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Schattman v. American Credit Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Randy International, Ltd. v. Automatic Compactor Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1979
- Silverman v. TurnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Monticello Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Ex Parte ClarkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Circle Floor Co. v. Siltan Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.